Fox News Latest Headlines
ESPN star calls out Jets head coach following team's loss to winless Dolphins
It’s unclear if a loss to the previously winless Miami Dolphins was a rock bottom moment for the New York Jets, but it feels as close as a team can get.
Miami won the game 28-25 and outgained New York 377-360. The Jets put pressure on the Dolphins in the fourth quarter, outscoring them 11-7, but a crucial three-and-out led to a Dolphins touchdown on the team’s next drive, which only took just over a minute.
THE CRAIG CARTON SHOW–UNFILTERED, UNAPOLOGETIC AND UNMISSABLE. DOWNLOAD HIS DAILY PODCAST NOW!
ESPN’s Mike Greenberg, a noted Jets superfan, took issue with Jets head coach Aaron Glenn’s explanation for not using his timeouts at the end of the first half. New York’s second quarter included an interception, a punt and one play to end the half. The Dolphins had two possessions – a punt and a 15-play, 91-yard touchdown drive.
"Maybe we should've called our timeouts to get it back, but at that point, we just felt like we were going to stop them and be able to get the ball back," Glenn told reporters.
But Greenberg wrote on X that Glenn’s answer about game management was "inexcusable."
CLICK HERE FOR MORE OUTKICK SPORTS COVERAGE
"This answer is inexcusable," Greenberg wrote. "Game management is the most important part of this job and he is as bad at it as any coach I’ve ever seen.
"There may not be any point in making the change now, but it’s over, it’s just a matter of when."
New York is only 2-5 on the season. The Jets started with a win over the Tennessee Titans, nearly beat the Green Bay Packers, Detroit Lions and then topped the AFC North-leading Cleveland Browns. Other losses were against the Chicago Bears and New England Patriots.
There have been highs but the lows have been almost too much to handle if you’re a Jets fan.
The Jets have not made the playoffs since 2010 and it looks like the unfortunate streak is going to continue this season unless something really changes.
Trump escalates attacks on El-Sayed as Michigan Senate race tightens and more top headlines
1. Trump escalates attacks on El-Sayed as Michigan Senate race tightens
2. 'If you run again': Nicki Minaj makes bold pledge to Trump at Michigan rally
3. Israel drills for surprise attack with massive military exercise as expert warns of 1973 repeat
MIDTERMS ON THE MAP — The states Trump and top Democrats are targeting before Election Day. Continue reading …
FULL CIRCLE — Zelenskyy's former aide makes claim about his ties to Moscow in push for meeting with Putin. Continue reading …
HATE PROBE — NYC rabbi stabbing suspect accused of attacking another Jewish man hours earlier. Continue reading …
DECADES AT STAKE — Attorney warns 'no sweet plea deal' for suspect in stepsister's cruise ship murder. Continue reading …
OVERLOADED — College homecoming party turns to chaos as deck collapses, leaving at least 28 people injured. Continue reading …
--
RIGHTWARD SHIFT — Trump's political revolution reverberates as U.S. neighbors confront new reality. Continue reading …
SNICKER SHOCK — Candy prices surge twice as fast as inflation, but Americans still plan to spend billions on Halloween. Continue reading …
PRESS FREEDOM TEST — $800-a-day penalty threatens to bleed investigative reporter dry as explosive legal fight escalates. Continue reading …
PULLING THE STRINGS — Bruce Blakeman mocks Hochul as 'puppet' of socialist Mamdani. Continue reading …
HALF THE STORY — Blanche challenges Dana Bash for only citing part of the Constitution during heated election clash. Continue reading ...
OFF-TRACK — Hilton counters Beshear's 2028 pitch with reminder of Newsom's rail record. Continue reading …
ON THE HOT SEAT — Rogers criticizes journalist over El-Sayed coverage: 'You're giving him a pass'. Continue reading …
HOLLYWOOD DIVIDE — 'Nobody Wants This' creator defends show after star accuses Israel of 'genocide'. Continue reading …
SEAN PARNELL — Trump restored the Department of War. Now it’s up to Congress to finish the job. Continue reading …
JERRY BALENTINE — AI is changing everything. Universities must teach Americans how to keep up. Continue reading …
--
HERO'S LEGACY — Guitarist-turned-firefighter who founded a billion-dollar restaurant empire dead at 65. Continue reading …
BRIDGES UNDER FIRE — Prince Harry making 'big mistake' that could destroy the chance of royal reconciliation, expert says. Continue reading ...
TECH SCRUTINY — Claude AI accesses voter data 'without being asked,' raising questions ahead of midterms. Continue reading ...
AMERICAN CULTURE QUIZ — Test yourself on famous feuds and skin secrets. Take the quiz here …
Tune in for an inside look at Minnesota scandals, GOP turnout and America's growing youth health crisis. Check it out ...
What's it looking like in your neighborhood? Continue reading…
Fox News Entertainment (FOX411)
Thank you for making us your first choice in the morning! We'll see you in your inbox first thing Tuesday.
Jonathan Taylor's wife knows things so dire family is on 'Colts transaction watch' expecting trades or firing
The 2027 NFL offseason has seemingly begun for the Indianapolis Colts and the most stunning part of it is people within the organization understand that's true.
That's how things are following a loss to the previously winless Tennessee Titans last week, the firing of general Chris Ballard one day later and a follow-up loss to the punchless but somehow undefeated Minnesota Vikings on Sunday.
That is definitely the way things are when the wife of the team's biggest star is talking openly about her husband getting traded.
SEASON IS ALREADY OVER FOR THESE FOUR NFL TEAMS AFTER WEEK 5, YOU CAN WRITE THEM OFF NOW
Yes, you read that right.
Jonathan Taylor's wife Ayanna Taylor over the weekend posted two videos on Instagram saying "players that once seemed untouchable," like her husband, "may now be on the table" in potential trades.
Want the most depressing part of this for Colts fans? Jonathan Taylor agreed with his wife's videos that make it clear their family is on what she called "a Colts transaction watch."
"I think it's been out there already so her adding doesn't really change anything," Taylor said after Sunday's loss. "Everybody's on TikTok these days so we just have to come in to work and focus."
Ayanna Taylor posted about the dire situation facing her husband's team by painting in her second video the truly depressing picture of what's next.
"Look at the situation that they put themselves in," she said. "They have a losing record, they just fired their 10-year GM, and they have no draft picks. How are they going to get new leadership to come in when they really have no options for new leadership to transform the team?
"Let's think about it: What do you do when you don't have what you need and you don't have the money to pay for it? ... You trade. That's what brings us back to my husband."
Taylor, who scored a touchdown and averaged 5.3 yards per rush against the stifling Vikings defense, is obviously a trade chip for interim general manager Ed Dodds.
If Dodds can move Taylor, or right defensive tackle DeForest Buckner, or left defensive tackle Grover Stewart or guard Quenton Nelson, or anyone not named Tyler Warren, before the Nov. 10 trade deadline, then it is a good bet he's going to consider it.
That, of course, is going to make coach Shane Steichen's life a little tougher. But maybe Steichen should have considered that before his team lost 12 of its last 14 games dating back to last season and is the only one in the NFL to lose to the Titans this season.
Besides, Steichen has bigger problems.
Bigger problem No. 1: Whether or not to bench quarterback Daniel Jones who has been a bitter disappointment. Jones threw another interception in a key situation on Sunday when the Colts were trying to rally for a go-ahead touchdown.
Jones has thrown four touchdown passes and seven interceptions in seven games and he's completing passes at a career-low clip of under 60%.
"I have not thought about a quarterback change," Steichen said after the game.
Well, Steichen should be thinking about it and problem No. 2: Owner Carlie Irsay-Gordon put him and Ballard on notice at the end of last year that the expectations for this year would be high.
Ballard is gone, so if the current trend continues firing Steichen is the next logical move. Maybe Steichen can survive the looming garage sale of players over the next couple of weeks.
But Steichen would be wise to also put himself on "Colts transaction watch."
$800-a-day penalty threatens to bleed investigative reporter dry as explosive legal fight escalates
Former Fox News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge is asking the Supreme Court to protect her confidential sources after a federal court ordered her to identify who helped expose a woman's alleged ties to China's military.
The outcome of the case could dramatically reshape the legal protections afforded to journalists working in the U.S. under the First Amendment.
Herridge was held in contempt and ordered to pay $800 per day for refusing to reveal sources behind her 2017 reporting on Yanping Chen, a Chinese American businesswoman who operated a university attended by U.S. military personnel. Her reporting raised questions about Chen's alleged past as a colonel for the People's Liberation Army (PLA) of China and the potential exposure of sensitive information about American service members.
The Department of War subsequently cut off military tuition assistance funding to Chen's university following a national security review, according to a filing by Herridge's legal team. The school had been receiving approximately $200,000 a month in taxpayer-funded tuition assistance.
NEW YORK TIMES BLASTS ‘ABUSIVE’ TRUMP SUBPOENAS TARGETING REPORTERS’ SOURCES
Now Chen, who was investigated by federal authorities but never charged with a crime, is pursuing a lawsuit against the federal government, alleging that officials improperly disclosed her private records to Herridge in violation of the Privacy Act. She has sought to compel Herridge to identify her sources as part of that litigation.
The dispute has reached the Supreme Court, where Herridge's attorneys are asking the justices to reconsider the legal standard used to force journalists to disclose confidential sources in civil cases.
Her legal team argues that the lower courts failed to adequately weigh the broader circumstances of Chen's lawsuit, including the Pentagon's national security findings and whether Chen can ultimately prevail in her claims against the government.
The case also exposes a longstanding disagreement among federal appeals courts over the scope of the reporter's privilege, an issue the Supreme Court has not comprehensively addressed in more than five decades.
Herridge's original investigation, published while she was working at Fox News in 2017, examined Chen's background and her operation of the University of Management and Technology in Arlington, Virginia, which enrolled U.S. military personnel using Defense Department tuition assistance.
The reporting included photographs appearing to show Chen in a Chinese military uniform and examined allegations that she had concealed her previous military service when applying for U.S. immigration benefits.
It also raised concerns about the university's collection of information on American service members, including details about their military training and professional backgrounds. A whistleblower interviewed for the investigation alleged that information stored on the school's computers could be accessed remotely from China.
WASHINGTON POST BOASTS IT STARED DOWN ‘UNWARRANTED’ JUSTICE DEPARTMENT SUBPOENA
Federal authorities had previously investigated Chen over potential immigration violations and counterintelligence concerns, but prosecutors in the Eastern District of Virginia declined to bring charges.
Following Herridge's reporting, the Pentagon completed a review of Chen's university and terminated its eligibility for military tuition assistance funding, according to her filing.
Chen subsequently filed suit against the federal government, alleging that confidential information from government records had been improperly disclosed to Herridge. She contends that identifying the officials responsible for the alleged disclosures is necessary to establish her Privacy Act claims.
Herridge refused to identify her sources, arguing that compelling disclosure would undermine the ability of journalists to obtain sensitive information from government officials and whistleblowers.
A federal judge ultimately ordered Herridge to disclose the sources and held her in civil contempt when she refused. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld the order, prompting her appeal to the Supreme Court.
Fox News Media has continued to support Herridge's legal fight, including covering her legal fees, despite her departure from the network in 2019.
At the center of Herridge's petition is a disagreement among federal appeals courts over how judges should evaluate a journalist's claim of privilege when confidential sources are sought in civil litigation.
The filing argues that the D.C. Circuit applied a narrow test focused primarily on whether Chen needed the information to pursue her lawsuit and whether she had exhausted alternative means of obtaining it.
They contend that courts should also consider the strength of the underlying lawsuit and the consequences of compelling disclosure, particularly when confidential national security sources may be involved.
The distinction could prove significant for journalists reporting on sensitive government matters. Under the standard challenged by Herridge, a plaintiff could obtain a reporter's confidential sources even if other deficiencies in the lawsuit would ultimately prevent the plaintiff from recovering damages, according to the petition.
What will we leave our children? The American Dream demands more than comfort
As Americans prepare to vote in the Nov. 3 midterm elections, much of the national conversation centers on which party will control Congress and what the next two years will mean for the country. Those are important questions, but a more consequential one reaches beyond the next election and our own lifetimes: What kind of America are we leaving to our children and grandchildren?
For much of our history, the American Dream was rooted in the conviction that the next generation should inherit greater freedom and opportunity than the one before it. Men and women crossed oceans, endured hardship, established communities and sacrificed their own comfort because they believed their children could enjoy opportunities they might never experience. They understood that the measure of a generation was not simply what it accumulated, but what it preserved for those who followed.
Consider the early settlers who crossed the Atlantic seeking religious freedom. They knew their journey would demand sacrifice, yet they believed the freedom to worship according to conscience was worth securing. Their convictions helped shape the American understanding that faith and conscience belong to the individual, not the government.
ARKANSAS TAKES HOME TOP RANKING FOR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM AFTER GOV SANDERS EXPANDS KEY PROTECTIONS
In his 1802 letter to the Danbury Baptists, President Thomas Jefferson affirmed the constitutional protection of religious conscience against government interference. Religious liberty was never intended to remove faith from public life. It was intended to protect the right of every American to freely exercise their religious beliefs and worship without government subjugation.
Later generations of immigrants came seeking economic opportunity. They worked difficult jobs, built businesses and raised families hoping their children might achieve more than they had. Their circumstances differed from those of the early settlers, but they shared a fundamental understanding of the American Dream: sacrificing something in the present to secure something greater for the future.
SEN TIM SCOTT: MY FAMILY'S JOURNEY SHOWS AMERICA'S FOUNDING PROMISE IS ALIVE AND STRONG
Somewhere along the way, we began losing that generational perspective. The American Dream increasingly became a question of what we could acquire and enjoy during our lifetimes rather than what we could build for those who followed. We became more concerned with protecting our immediate comfort than confronting the difficult decisions necessary to preserve our children's future.
Our national finances illustrate that shift. The federal government continues operating with enormous annual deficits, adding to a national debt future generations will inherit. Reasonable people disagree over spending priorities, taxation and government's proper role. Yet every American should consider whether we are willing to make difficult decisions today or are content to pass their consequences to children who have no voice in making them.
AMERICA’S DEBT CRISIS THREATENS OUR CHILDREN’S FUTURE. WE THE PEOPLE NEED TO FIX IT
This is ultimately a question of stewardship that extends far beyond government spending. A free society cannot survive indefinitely on previous generations' sacrifices while refusing to make sacrifices of its own. Religious liberty, economic opportunity, strong families and healthy communities require more than appreciation for what we inherited. They require the conviction to preserve those blessings for people we may never meet.
Christians should understand this responsibility. Scripture calls believers to care for others and pass the knowledge of God from one generation to the next. In John 13:34, Jesus commands His disciples to love one another as He has loved them. That love is demonstrated through what we are willing to give of ourselves for others.
AMERICA’S NEXT 250 YEARS DEPEND ON PASSING FAITH AND FREEDOM TO OUR CHILDREN
Yet I wonder whether we have become so accustomed to inherited freedoms that we have forgotten what preserving them requires. Previous generations endured persecution and extraordinary hardship to secure religious liberty. Today, Christians sometimes hesitate to express their convictions because doing so might cost them their reputation, influence or standing within their circles. We should consider what that reveals about our understanding of sacrifice.
Pastors and Christian leaders know the pressure to avoid controversy. Biblical teaching can offend cultural sensibilities, challenge prevailing assumptions or invite criticism. Yet Hebrews 4:12 (KJV) reminds us that "the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword."
SOUTHERN BAPTIST PRESIDENT CALLS ON PASTORS TO 'STEP UP' AHEAD OF MIDTERM ELECTIONS
Scripture was never intended to conform to the prevailing opinions of the culture, but to penetrate the hearts and consciences of those who hear it. The temptation is to soften the message, avoid difficult subjects and preserve comfort through silence. Yet Christian leadership has never been about making faith comfortable. It is about proclaiming biblical truth without compromise, equipping believers to live faithfully and preparing the next generation to understand the convictions entrusted to them.
The church cannot fulfill that responsibility by retreating from questions shaping American life. Christian communicators, whether standing behind a pulpit, speaking into a microphone or reaching audiences through digital media, must communicate truth with clarity and courage. The platforms may change, but our responsibility to pass on what we have received does not.
November's elections will determine who holds political power for a season. They will not determine whether parents teach their children the value of freedom, pastors faithfully proclaim Scripture or Christians sacrifice their comfort for future generations. Those responsibilities cannot be delegated to Washington, nor do they disappear when an election ends.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION
The American Dream was never meant to be a purely personal arrangement, a private guarantee that each of us, in our own lifetime, could claim "Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness" for ourselves alone. It was always a longer promise: a commitment to build and keep a country in which those same freedoms and opportunities would remain available to the generations who follow.
We enjoy the possibility of that dream because earlier Americans treated it as something worth protecting beyond their own lifetimes. They understood that the real measure of the work was not only what they could enjoy, but what they left standing for those who had not yet arrived. In that sense, the dream was never finished in any single generation; it was entrusted, again and again, to the next.
People living past 100 in one tiny village share 3 daily habits
National Geographic researchers believe they may have discovered a new "blue zone."
A blue zone is a geographic region where residents show unusually high rates of longevity and survival into old age. The newest blue zone candidate is a small village called Bolotana, located on the Italian island of Sardinia.
In a 2024 snapshot, 10 of the village's 2,262 residents were at least 100 years old, according to National Geographic — roughly 10 times the Sardinian average and 11 times the U.S. average.
PEOPLE WHO LIVE TO 100 HAVE 3 DRINKS IN COMMON, LONGEVITY EXPERT SAYS
A team of researchers, including Dan Buettner — founder of Blue Zones, a company focused on longevity, and a National Geographic Fellow — set out to investigate Bolotana’s exceptional lifespan.
The findings were published in Frontiers in Aging.
Buettner highlighted three lifestyle habits that are common among Bolotana’s long-lived residents.
The study did not establish that these habits directly cause longevity, but researchers are examining how the village’s environment and traditions may contribute to its unusually high survival rates.
"The international team of demographers, their population scientists … were able to examine the birth records, death records and baptismal records and see that this is probably the richest, most complete data on centenarians in the world," Buettner told Fox News Digital.
AMERICA'S LIFESPAN HAS DOUBLED SINCE 1776 — EXPERTS REVEAL WHAT CHANGED
"For those of us who want to make it into our 90s and 100s in full health, this place does it better than anyplace else in the world."
The strongest longevity advantage appeared among Bolotana’s women, who ranked second only to Hong Kong for life expectancy at age 70 and survival from age 70 to 100.
The original Sardinian blue zone was identified in the late 1990s and formally described in research published around 2000. Located in the mountainous region roughly 68 miles from Bolotana, it is known for unusually strong male longevity, according to Buettner.
Although Bolotana remains partly pastoral, it is also an agricultural community. Buettner suggested that this may mean men spend more time at home helping with household responsibilities, potentially reducing the burden on women.
"In the original blue zone in the highlands, the [women] worried about the finances and raising children and the leaky roof," he said. "They're all alone. Here, men are participating more, and that could explain why women are doing better, because they're only bearing half the stress load instead of almost all of it."
Buettner believes the village’s strong social connections may be one factor behind the women’s longevity, although the study did not establish a cause.
GEORGIA WOMAN CELEBRATES 112TH BIRTHDAY, REVEALS HER SECRET TO A LONG LIFE
"We see women gathering in the library, baking bread together, making sweets together and going to church together," he said. "So, you see a much more socially connected society among the women in Bolotana than in the other blue zones."
As in many parts of Italy, Bolotana has a strong Catholic tradition. Buettner said church attendance may provide residents with faith, social connection and a sense of belonging.
"It’s a sense of community, but it's also people proactively understanding that sitting down with a friend and talking about your troubles and your day with somebody who cares about you is a much more powerful drug than a pharmaceutical," Buettner said.
"The human species has shown this over and over, and Bolotana is a perfect example."
Diet varies among blue zones, but Bolotana’s traditional fare is largely plant-based, with a focus on beans, vegetables, wheat, olives and olive oil, along with some cheese and meat.
DOCTOR'S 10 RULES FOR LIVING LONGER, CELEBRATING MORE BIRTHDAYS AND MAKING EXTRA YEARS COUNT
"About 90% of a centenarian's diet has been all plant-based," Buettner said. "Not protein, by the way. These aren't protein loaders. These are complex carbohydrate loaders."
A Bolotanese breakfast might consist of a piece of bread or cheese with local olives and a cup of coffee. Lunch, the biggest meal of the day that starts in the early afternoon, is "almost always" a minestrone soup made with locally grown seasonal vegetables and lots of beans.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES
"Beans are the cornerstone of the longevity diet here," Buettner said. "Garbanzo beans, lentil beans, pinto beans, cannellini beans — these are really the all-star of the diet."
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER
Traditionally, residents ate meat about five times per month, usually as a celebratory food.
In the highlands, people traditionally cooked with lard, Buettner said, while Bolotana residents use olive oil from ancient trees.
Researchers are studying whether the oil’s unusually high levels of odd-chain fatty acids could be relevant to longevity.
Bolotana residents are not deliberately pursuing longer lives, the longevity researcher noted. The region has little emphasis on gym culture or biohacking.
"These are real humans with an average set of genes," Buettner said. "These aren’t superhumans with superhuman discipline or better genes."
TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ
"They’re not chasing longevity," he added. "It is the product of their environment."
Because Bolotana’s streets are steep and residents rarely drive within town, they typically walk to shops, cafés, workplaces and friends’ homes, Buettner said.
"It’s this sort of unconscious walking that’s far more important for longevity than going to the gym."
Buettner said Bolotana is an example of how daily routines and surroundings can encourage movement without requiring residents to schedule formal exercise.
Residents of walkable American communities have a three- to five-year life-expectancy advantage over those in less-walkable areas, he said.
"If we want a healthier America, we have to start thinking about shaping our neighborhoods and our cities so people can unconsciously move and not rely on heaping another obligation on their busy lives to remember to go to the gym," the expert said.
"Most of the things that lead to Bolotana longevity are also pleasant and make the journey a joy," he added.
NFL's dumbest moment of the week once again welcomes Jets coach Aaron Glenn, who is on the hot seat
When it was over, Aaron Glenn was blaming and second-guessing himself after another New York Jets loss. And this has become perhaps too familiar for the team's coach this season.
The Jets lost to the previously winless Miami Dolphins on Sunday, and while that can happen because the other guys get paid, too, the Dolphins had been getting paid without winning before this one.
In fact, the Dolphins had been getting paid without even leading a game all season.
WINLESS DOLPHINS END HISTORIC DROUGHT AND THEY DID IT AGAINST THE ALMOST-AS-HAPLESS JETS
But against Glenn's team, the Dolphins looked like a playoff contender. That left Glenn disappointed. And defeated.
"When it comes to this game, highly disappointed," Glenn lamented. "Disappointed in myself, first and foremost."
Glenn is familiar with losing this season, but when the head coach is blaming himself for his clock management, that familiar spot is problematic. And that's exactly where Glenn was for the second time this season — guilty of the dumbest moment of the week.
That Week 7 moment:
The Dolphins held a 14-7 lead with 8:44 left before halftime, and then they went on the Earth's longest drive.
They marched from their own 9-yard line to the Jets 32-yard line with only two minutes remaining until half. Holding all his timeouts, Glenn stood idly on the sideline like a spectator.
"Yeah, I think that's one they were already down in the red zone, correct?" Glenn asked reporters who wanted an explanation. "That’s the one you’re talking about?"
Well, the Dolphins weren't in the red zone. They were at the New York 25 with 1:16 to play. But Glenn saved his timeouts for use in the year 2037, when he maybe gets his next head coaching opportunity.
So the clock ticked, and ticked and ticked, and the next time Miami ran a play, there were only 35 left on the clock.
The Dolphins eventually scored again, and the moment passed, but the clock management from the coach was curious.
"Man, we felt like we were going to stop them," Glenn said. "And maybe we should have called our timeouts to get it back, but at that point, we just felt like we were going to stop them and be able to get the ball back.
"That's something that we should have done is use our timeouts."
Yes, correct.
Glenn's explanation actually makes zero sense because if the Jets had done as he thought and held the Dolphins scoreless, using the timeouts would have given the Jets the football back with more time remaining on the clock.
As it was, the Jets got the ball back with six seconds remaining in the first half, which New York used to merely take a knee.
The second half witnessed something of a Jets rally before the Dolphins eventually prevailed 28-25, but that made the failure to a call time out more glaring because the Jets might have used that extra time in the first half to manage a field goal — which eventually was the difference in the game.
The Jets, by the way, are 2-5 and Glenn is in serious trouble. His teams are terrible just before halftime, having been outscored 107-6 in the coach's 24 games.
And owner Woody Johnson has not given Glenn a vote of confidence like he did at this stage in the 2025 season. Johnson declined to speak with reporters at the League Fall Meeting last week.
THE CRAIG CARTON SHOW–UNFILTERED, UNAPOLOGETIC AND UNMISSABLE. DOWNLOAD HIS DAILY PODCAST NOW!
"We all have to get better, from coaching to playing to everything that we’re doing, we have to get better," Glenn said. "... We know what’s going to happen from the outside in, we accept that, and it is what it is.
"This is a time where our guys, we’ve got to lock arms to make sure that everything that we get as far as energy and connection is going to be built from within, and we understand that.
"But we’ve got to play better, and our fans deserve better than that, and that starts with me."
If Glenn continues to mismanage the clock, a coaching change is going to start with him.
WWE star Drew McIntyre offers sobering reminder amid spate of deaths to hit pro wrestling world
The pro wrestling world has been hit hard with deaths over the last few weeks.
Benjamin Satterley, the former WWE and All Elite Wrestling (AEW) star, Rick Achberger, a WWE superfan lovingly known as "Rick the Sign Guy," and former "Saved by the Bell" star Dennis Haskins, who was involved in some WWE storylines, all died within weeks of each other.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE OUTKICK PRO WRESTLING COVERAGE
WWE star Drew McIntyre, who is in the micro-drama series "Agent of Shadows," told OutKick Dropkick to "remember to tell the ones you love, you love them" as he mourned the loss of all three men.
"I remember him as the best of us," McIntyre said of Satterley. "He was so positive all the time to everybody around him in an industry where you can be negative at times. He was unbelievable in the ring. He never ever changed. I've seen him from day one of his career, fresh out the backyard, in a company called 3CW in Carlisle, England, he'd literally just started wrestling there fresh in the backyard, and I was told wait till you see Pac, and I was a teenager at the time, and my mind was blown. I'd never seen anyone so precise, so accurate, so unbelievable, and such a nice guy, and we traveled to Ireland together, went to London together.
"We used to tell each other, hey, I was like man, you're the one that's going to break out from the U.K., he'd tell me the same thing, and to see how far he came, the career he had, and, most importantly, the person he was the whole time was amazing and you've seen the response online that tells to the character of the man."
THE CRAIG CARTON SHOW–UNFILTERED, UNAPOLOGETIC AND UNMISSABLE. DOWNLOAD HIS DAILY PODCAST NOW!
McIntyre spoke with OutKick Dropkick before he put out his video tribute of Satterley. He added that Satterley’s legacy extended beyond the ring because of the man he was.
"I've tried to write things, I even tried to do a video and it just, I don't know, nothing felt right, it's just shocking, 40 years old," McIntyre said. "But to leave that kind of legacy, the body of work's one thing, you know, a lot of guys have got an incredible body of work in wrestling, you Google their name, not good people. I think the most important thing, Ben gets looked back on, it's crazy to think about him in the past tense, it'll be with positivity and that he really made an impact on people personally."
"And I'd have to mention my guy Rick as well." he continued. "I tried to write something about him again. He was part of our WWE family or one of our super fans. And when I was 22, came to America, get put straight on TV and live events with people like The Undertaker and Triple H and Shawn Michaels, I was terrified. The crowd did not care.
"He would get them going every time. He would get them booing me if I was a bad guy, cheering me if I was a good guy, until eventually I found my feet and then he would abuse me every time and I loved every second of it. Yeah, it's been a hard week in our industry and Mr. Belding as well, Dennis (Haskins). I used to call him Mr. B all the time. I just looked at a picture of us flipping the camera off together, it's, it's been a hard week and yeah, just remember to tell the ones you love, you love them."
Nothing hits harder than losing a loved one in your circle and no one knows that more than the pro wrestling world – especially lately.
Teen accused of stepsister’s cruise ship murder buys time to consider plea but won’t get ‘sweet’ deal: expert
The federal high-seas murder case against a teenager accused of sexually assaulting and strangling his own stepsister aboard a cruise ship has reached a pivotal juncture. Court filings reveal the defense has requested more time to consider reaching a plea deal.
Timothy Hudson, who was 16 at the time, is accused of the sexual assault and strangling death of Anna Kepner, 18, aboard the Carnival Horizon on Nov. 7, 2025. He is being charged as an adult in the federal case in Florida.
The plea deadline was originally Friday, Oct. 23, but that has now been extended to January to give the defense team more time. A judge granted this extension earlier this month.
TEEN ACCUSED OF KILLING STEPSISTER ON CARNIVAL CRUISE SHIP ORDERED DETAINED BEFORE MURDER TRIAL
Read the motion here:
A federal grand jury indicted Hudson in April, to which he initially entered a not guilty plea. He is currently being held in a federal pretrial detention center after a judge made an order in June remanding him to federal custody.
TEEN STEPBROTHER ACCUSED OF KILLING ANNA KEPNER ON CARNIVAL CRUISE REMAINS FREE BEFORE TRIAL
He was previously in the custody of his family, with an ankle monitor.
With the new changes and extended plea deal deadline, it's possible that Hudson's defense team is trying to iron out a plea deal for the teenager.
"For a case like this, you’re talking about whether or not the defendant gets life or not," Anthony Strazza said.
FOLLOW THE FOX TRUE CRIME TEAM ON X
Strazza, a criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor who practices in federal and state courts, is not affiliated with the case.
SIGN UP TO GET THE LATEST TRUE CRIME NEWS
He said Hudson’s defense team could be negotiating a guilty plea in exchange for prosecutors not recommending life without parole.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE FROM THE FOX TRUE CRIME HUB
"There’s not going to be any sweet plea deal, regardless of whether or not they take a plea. The numbers [years in prison] are going to be large," Strazza said.
Because Hudson is so young, Strazza said even if he is found guilty and sentenced to decades behind bars — there is a possibility that Hudson could serve his time and get out of jail in his 30s.
PROSECUTORS WARN ANNA KEPNER’S STEPBROTHER SHOULDN’T ROAM FREE AFTER ALLEGED CRUISE SHIP MURDER
"You’re talking about a defendant who’s 16 years old, so there’s a huge difference between life and, let’s say, a 30-year sentence," Strazza said.
LISTEN TO THE NEW 'CRIME & JUSTICE WITH DONNA ROTUNNO' PODCAST
Strazza said Hudson could be expected to serve "at least 85 percent" of any federal prison sentence.
"Even if he does get big numbers, 20, 30 years, he is still going to be relatively young when he completes that time."
Hudson's defense attorney, Eric Cohen, declined to comment on the case when reached by Fox News Digital.
Prince Harry making 'big mistake' that could destroy chance of royal reconciliation: expert
Several royal experts believe Prince Harry is making a "big mistake" that could ruin his chances of reconciling with his family.
In his first major interview since returning to the U.K. with his family, the Duke of Sussex told GQ he wants to make peace with his father and brother. However, royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams told Fox News Digital that Harry's willingness to publicly discuss his strained family relationships only makes the royals more reluctant to extend an olive branch.
"The peace offering is already undermined as it is public," said Fitzwilliams. "That continues to be his big mistake. He cannot be trusted. [The Sussexes] had already launched brutal attacks on the royal family [with their tell-alls]. Family disputes are bitter. But numerous interventions from 'friends' and interviews like Harry's in GQ make this highly unlikely."
PRINCE HARRY SAYS ‘MOST IMPORTANT THING IS TO RECONCILE’ WITH ROYAL FAMILY
Speaking about the family rift, Harry told GQ: "Some people don't want it to work out. I want it to work out. With everything else that's going on in the world, the most important thing is to reconcile — that's the key point."
"Scars stick around forever," Harry continued. "But what your perception is, and what your mindset is to those things that have happened, letting go of the past. That’s something that I would encourage everybody to do: If there’s certain things from the past that are still affecting you every day, that’s harder to let go of. But, for me, there’s enough drama in the world and enough drama in people’s lives to continue with issues with family."
Harry also told GQ that he has been "really criticized" for sharing his side of the story.
WATCH HERE: KING CHARLES URGED TO BRING PRINCE HARRY, MEGHAN MARKLE BACK INTO FOLD: EXPERT
"I find it fascinating because everybody else is allowed to tell their version of my story, but God forbid I should be able to tell the other side of it."
Royal broadcaster Helena Chard told Fox News Digital that although Harry may yearn for reconciliation after years of the Sussexes publicly airing their grievances, "the palace doesn't trust Harry and Meghan." Chard said Harry's decision to speak publicly "proves Prince William's fear — anything said in private will end up in print."
"Vindication on Megxit and absolution without apology do not equate to reconciliation," Chard added.
Fox News Digital reached out to Buckingham Palace and Kensington Palace for comment.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex stepped back from their roles as senior royals in 2020, citing intense media scrutiny and a lack of support from the palace. After moving to California that year, the couple discussed their struggles in interviews and documentaries. Harry's 2023 memoir, "Spare," further strained his relationship with the royals. Several experts told Fox News Digital that Harry and William are still not on speaking terms.
On Oct. 15, the Sussexes attended a series of charity events in Nottingham, marking their first major joint outing since their reported return to the U.K. The appearances drew attention from royal experts, many of whom compared them to official royal engagements.
GET ENTERTAINMENT SCOOP DELIVERED RIGHT TO YOUR EMAIL BY CLICKING HERE
In January 2020, Queen Elizabeth II made clear following the Sandringham Summit that there would be no "half in, half out" role for the Sussexes. They couldn't remain working members of the royal family while pursuing independent, income-generating ventures.
"Following conversations with the duke, the queen has written confirming that in stepping away from the work of the royal family it is not possible to continue with the responsibilities and duties that come with a life of public service," Buckingham Palace said in a statement on Feb. 19, 2021.
In response, the couple issued a statement of their own, saying: "We can all live a life of service. Service is universal."
Shortly after the couple returned to the U.K., Buckingham Palace released a letter from the Lord Chamberlain, written on behalf of King Charles III, stressing that there was "no change" to their status. The letter stated that Harry and Meghan are "no longer working members of the royal family" and that their charitable work "is a personal matter for them both and undertaken in their private capacity."
"In short, their position is akin to private citizens with commercial and charitable interests," the letter added.
A source close to the Sussexes then pushed back against the description of the couple as "private citizens."
LIKE WHAT YOU'RE READING? CLICK HERE FOR MORE ENTERTAINMENT NEWS
"They are public figures," the source told People magazine. "Members of the public know who they are. The idea that they can live a normal, 'private' life is sadly not realistic."
Another friend of the couple told The Times that Harry and Meghan "hate" the phrase "working members of the royal family."
"'Working members of the royal family' is a really lazy phrase," the friend told The Times. "He hates it, she hates it. They are not 'working' for the institution, but they are members of the royal family, and they work."
The friend said the Sussexes also dislike the term "former royals."
"Things like Nottingham aren't done in the name of the institution or the crown, but Harry is the son of the king, he is still a member of the royal family, he's just not a member of the institution. It's misleading to call them 'former royals.' It has an impact on how they're perceived and the way people talk about them."
A friend of the Sussexes told Hello! magazine that Harry and Meghan never agreed to the late queen's decision to prohibit a "half in, half out" arrangement.
PUT YOUR ENTERTAINMENT KNOWLEDGE TO THE TEST AND SEE HOW YOU SCORE
"It doesn't trouble them," the friend said. "They never agreed they wouldn't be half in, half out. That was what was decided and foisted upon them."
"They’re just living their lives and they can, because they’re financially independent," the friend added.
Fox News Digital reached out to Archewell for comment.
British royal expert Hilary Fordwich told Fox News Digital that former palace courtiers were appalled by the unidentified friend's remarks.
"Harry publicly declared he'd accepted the agreement with his grandmother, the queen," Fordwich said.
Royal broadcaster Ian Pelham Turner told Fox News Digital that the royal family, often referred to as "The Firm," made "a mistake" by not allowing the Sussexes to resume their royal duties and support the king.
"Harry and Meghan are not private citizens — this was decreed by King Charles in the letter created by the Lord Chamberlain which, in my view, was humiliating for the couple," Turner said.
"What that means is that Harry and Meghan can do whatever they want right now. … It just goes to show at the moment that whoever is advising the royal family [is] constantly making mistakes. Because if they really wanted to control Harry and Meghan, they would invite them back so that they can be part of the royal family and could actually control what's going on."
"Yet the same accusations are levied against Meghan and Harry when they apparently have decided to do an event for themselves in Nottingham," Turner said. "What is the difference? I ask. Because, in reality, they are allowed to do whatever they want to do now to actually promote their charities and good causes."
Fordwich also suggested there was a "divide" between King Charles III and Prince William over how to handle Harry's return to the U.K.
"The divide is as follows: The king craves family united, keeping the door open and aiming to facilitate some sort of way back, while he is though completely united with Prince William that the Sussexes will never again represent the royal family," Fordwich explained.
"Obviously, from both his actions and words, Harry is rather desperate for reconciliation," she said. "But with every public statement and action, rather ironically, he's actually thwarting any remote chance now of even a familial thawing."
Fordwich doesn't believe Harry will reconcile with his family anytime soon.
"Writers of 'The Crown' must be sitting with pens poised at this now ridiculous situation escalating," Fordwich said. "Although Harry and Meghan wish to build proper bridges, the king apparently refuses to even discuss the subject."