Fox News Latest Headlines
US skier’s quest for Olympic gold comes to a crushing halt after terrifying crash
Nick Goepper risked it all on his final Olympic run.
The 35-year-old American skier was in the bronze medal spot when he began his last run in the men’s halfpipe freestyle skiing competition Friday in Milan with a chance at the gold medal, but it ended in a crushing blow on his final trick.
Goepper landed everything successfully until his fifth and final jump, when he didn’t get enough height on his leap and landed hard on the halfpipe ledge.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM
He lay on the snow for several minutes, and for as hard as he crashed, everyone held their collective breath as he was tended to by medical staff, who seemed ready to pull him away on a stretcher.
However, Goepper stood up on his own two feet, gave a thumbs-up and a smile, and walked off under his own power.
Unfortunately, insult was added to injury as Canada’s Brendan MacKay bested Goepper’s score to push him off the podium and take the bronze.
USA WOMEN'S HOCKEY TEAM BRINGS OLYMPIC GOLD BACK HOME IN OT THRILLER OVER CANADA
It was not all bad news for the Americans, though, as Goepper's teammate, Alex Ferreira, took home the gold medal.
Goepper entered this year’s Games with three other medals — one each from Sochi, Pyeongchang and Beijing — but none of them gold.
The broadcast said the trick Goepper attempted had never been done in competition.
"I have no regrets," he appeared to say as he walked off the mountain.
Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter
Actor Eric Dane's death from ALS sparks urgent focus on rapid decline
Eric Dane’s death has sparked conversations about the speed and severity of ALS.
Also known as Lou Gehrig’s disease, the progressive illness — officially called amyotrophic lateral sclerosis — is debilitating and fatal.
While only about 5,000 people in the U.S. are diagnosed each year, the average life expectancy is just two to five years, according to the ALS Association.
Dane, who most famously starred as Dr. Mark "McSteamy" Sloan on ABC's "Grey’s Anatomy," announced his diagnosis in April 2025, telling "Good Morning America" in June that his first symptoms began as "some weakness" in his right hand.
‘GREY’S ANATOMY' STAR ERIC DANE DEAD AT 53
"I didn't really think anything of it," the actor said. "At the time, I thought maybe I'd been texting too much, or my hand was fatigued. But a few weeks later, I noticed that it got a little worse."
"I'm fighting as much as I can," Dane added. "There's so much about it that's out of my control."
ALS is a progressive disease where the brain loses connection with the muscles, according to the ALS Association. This slowly strips a person’s ability to walk, talk, eat, dress, write, speak, swallow and, eventually, breathe.
Early signs include muscle weakness, stiffness and cramping. Symptom progression and severity are different for each case, as the association notes there is "no single timeline for ALS."
REBECCA GAYHEART STEPS UP AS CAREGIVER FOR ESTRANGED HUSBAND ERIC DANE AS ALS DEMANDS 24-HOUR CARE
The disease only impacts motor neurons controlling voluntary movement, so the five senses — sight, touch, hearing, taste and smell — are not affected, nor are the eye muscles or bladder control.
Many ALS patients remain "mentally alert and aware" throughout the disease, the ALS Association reported.
Diagnosis typically occurs in people between the ages of 40 and 70. About 20% of patients live five years or longer. Only about 5% live longer than 20 years.
5 CELEBRITIES WHO WENT PUBLIC WITH ALARMING HEALTH DIAGNOSES IN 2025
ALS is typically diagnosed by a neurologist with an electromyography test (EMG), but can also be detected by blood and urine tests, spinal taps, MRIs and other imaging scans, muscle and nerve biopsies, or neurological exams.
There is currently no cure or treatment to stop disease progression, although there are treatments to slow and ease symptoms, per the ALS Association.
Fox News senior medical analyst Dr. Marc Siegel joined "Fox & Friends" on Friday to discuss the prevalence of ALS, suggesting that cases have increased due to "something in the environment that we don’t know yet."
While ALS is 10% genetic, according to Siegel, 90% of cases do not have a genetic link, pointing toward other risk factors like environmental toxins.
"It's a muscle weakness disease — affecting nerves that innervate muscles — and usually it starts on one side," the doctor shared. "Then you develop fatigue ... You could see a quivering tongue or your arm is quivering, usually one side and then the other side."
CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES
As the weakness progresses, it impacts speech and ultimately attacks the diaphragm, making it difficult to fully inflate the lungs.
"That’s what happened to [Dane], most likely," Siegel said. "So, it progresses from your arms, your legs, your speech, your swallowing ability and then your breathing."
ALS progresses "pretty rapidly in most cases," Siegel said. While scientist Stephen Hawking lived 55 years with the disease, Dane "probably lived about two years with it," the doctor surmised.
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER
"I want to point out how courageous [Dane] is — he actually was involved with Target ALS, where he was fighting for new research," Siegel pointed out. "We're learning to personalize the approach to this disease, and that's the future — and he fought for that."
"We need a lot of money for research for this — [Dane] was asking for a billion dollars from the government."
Various research groups and hospital systems are actively working on new ALS therapies that take a personalized approach, Siegel shared.
The estimated cost to develop a drug that would slow or stop disease progression is $2 billion, the ALS Association has reported. The annual estimated out-of-picket cost for care is $250,000.
TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ
Funding for ALS research and awareness has been on the rise for years, with the viral social media ALS Ice Bucket Challenge making a splash in 2014.
The challenge, supported by the ALS Association, was intended to boost awareness. It ultimately raised $115 million toward ALS research and patient care.
US skier Alex Ferreira wins gold medal in men's free ski halfpipe to end Olympic career
American Alex Ferreira took home a gold medal in the Olympic freestyle skiing men’s free ski halfpipe on Friday at the Livigno Snow Park.
Ferreira, 31, scored a 93.75 on his final run and narrowly edged out Estonia’s Henry Sildaru, who scored a 93.00, to secure the top spot on the podium for the first time in his career. Canada’s Brendan Mackay earned a bronze medal, scoring a 91.00 in his final run to knock American Nick Goepper off the podium.
Ferreira won a silver in this event in the 2018 Pyeongchang Olympic Games and a bronze medal in the 2022 Beijing Olympics. The Colorado native said that these Olympic Games were likely to be his last one, according to Olympics.com.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM
Now he will head back home with his first-ever gold medal.
Ferreira has made 16 World Cup podiums and won seven X Games medals. In 2023-24, he won every contest he entered and became the first halfpipe skier to have a perfect season.
USA WOMEN'S HOCKEY SINGS NATIONAL ANTHEM ARM IN ARM AFTER OLYMPIC GOLD MEDAL WIN: 'THE BEST PART'
Ferreira was nearly joined by Goepper on the podium, but Goepper’s quest for a medal was halted after a harrowing crash, giving Mackay a chance to reach the podium.
Goepper finished fourth, and American Birk Irving finished fifth.
American Hunter Hess, who was criticized by President Donald Trump following Hess’s controversial remarks about representing the United States at the Olympics under the current administration, did not place and finished in 10th.
Ferreira’s gold medal was the 10th for the United States in the Milan Cortina Olympic Games, tying an American Winter Olympics record for most gold medals won. The United States won 10 gold medals in the 2002 Salt Lake City Olympic Games.
Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.
Omar calls GOP probe into husband’s $30M business surge a ‘political stunt’ as records deadline passes
The office of Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., on Friday called a GOP-led investigation into her family's finances a "stunt," one day after a House deadline for her husband to turn over records tied to his companies’ rapid growth.
The House Oversight Committee had set Feb. 19 as a deadline for Tim Mynett, Omar’s husband, to provide information about the sudden success of two of his companies to the House Oversight Committee.
"This is all a political stunt. These sham accusations were referred to the Ethics Committee, and our office has not received any follow-up because this is a baseless, headline-generating speculation and a politically targeted attack on the Congresswoman," a spokesperson for Omar told Fox News Digital.
Omar’s office declined to say whether it had submitted the business records as requested by lawmakers.
eStCru LLC, a winery, and Rose Lake Capital LLC, a consulting firm, both owned partially by Mynett, increased sharply in reported value between 2023 and 2024, drawing questions from lawmakers about the source of the pair’s wealth.
In just one year, the two companies added roughly $30 million in combined value.
The Oversight Committee, led by Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., asked Mynett to produce communications regarding the companies’ latest audits and with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), correspondence with any other federal agencies, and travel records to or from the United Arab Emirates, Somalia or Kenya.
Omar’s office called the probe a GOP-led distraction from other hot-topic issues.
"If Republicans were interested in real oversight, they would be looking at Trump and his family enriching their net worth by billions of dollars, as well as their connections to their pedophile friend, Jeffrey Epstein," Omar’s spokesperson said.
MINNESOTA GOV WALZ, AG ELLISON TO TESTIFY IN HOUSE INVESTIGATION INTO ALLEGED $9B WELFARE FRAUD
When asked if Omar and Mynett had turned in the requested documentation, a spokesperson for the House Oversight Committee told Fox News Digital that the committee has referred the matter to the House Ethics Committee, the body tasked with investigating financial disclosure statements and member misconduct.
"Americans have concerns about Rep. Omar’s skyrocketing wealth while in public office. The House Oversight Committee initiated a probe into these concerns and has asked the House Ethics Committee to do its job and review this matter," a spokesperson for the House Oversight Committee told Fox News Digital.
In its letter to Mynett sent earlier this year, the Oversight Committee said it needed the business details to ensure Omar wasn’t being unduly influenced by her husband's success.
MASSIVE MINNESOTA FRAUD CASE PUTS AG KEITH ELLISON UNDER MICROSCOPE AS CLIMATE TIES RESURFACE
"Financial disclosure forms, filed by your wife, Representative Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, show eStCru LLC and Rose Lake Capital LLC, which you hold ownership stakes in, went from being worth as much as $51,000 in 2023 to as much as $30 million in 2024," the committee wrote.
"Given that these companies do not publicly list their investors or where their money comes from, this sudden jump in value raises concerns that unknown individuals may be investing to gain influence with your wife," the Oversight Committee added.
The House Ethics Committee declined to comment on whether it would open a probe into Omar or her husband.
Trump gives Iran 10-day ultimatum, but experts signal talks may be buying time for strike
President Trump said in June he would decide "within the next two weeks" whether to strike Iran. He made the decision two days later.
On Thursday, he gave Tehran another clock, saying the Islamic Republic has 10 to 15 days to come to the negotiating table or face consequences.
The compressed timeline now sits at the center of a new round of high-stakes nuclear diplomacy. But with Trump, deadlines can serve as both warning and weapon.
Jason Brodsky, policy director at United Against Nuclear Iran, told Fox News Digital, "The Iranian regime has been operating under a grand delusion that they can turn President Trump into President Obama and President Trump has made it clear that that’s not happening."
TRUMP MEETS NETANYAHU, SAYS HE WANTS IRAN DEAL BUT REMINDS TEHRAN OF ‘MIDNIGHT HAMMER’ OPERATION
Brodsky said there is little expectation inside the administration that diplomacy will produce a breakthrough. "I think there’s deep skepticism in the Trump administration that this negotiation is going to produce any acceptable outcome."
Instead, he said, the talks may be serving a dual purpose. "They’re using the diplomatic process to sharpen the choices of the Iranian leadership and to buy time to make sure that we have the appropriate military assets in the region."
A Middle Eastern source with knowledge of the negotiations told Fox News Digital that Tehran understands how close the risk of war feels and is unlikely to deliberately provoke Trump at this stage.
However, the source said Iran cannot accept limitations on its short-range missile program, describing the issue as a firm red line set by Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. Iranian negotiators are not authorized to cross that boundary, and conceding on missiles would be viewed internally as equivalent to losing a war.
The source indicated there may be more flexibility around uranium enrichment parameters if sanctions relief is part of the equation.
According to Brodsky, Iran’s core positions remain unchanged. "They’re trying to engage in a lot of distraction… shiny objects, to distract from the fact that they’re not prepared to make the concessions that President Trump is requiring of them," he said. "The Iranian positions do not change and have not changed fundamentally. They refuse to accept President Trump’s position on zero enrichment. They refuse to dismantle their nuclear infrastructure. They refuse limitations on Iran’s missile program, and they refuse to end support for terror groups."
VANCE WARNS IRAN THAT 'ANOTHER OPTION ON THE TABLE' IF NUCLEAR DEAL NOT REACHED
Behnam Taleblu, senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, warned that Tehran may be preparing a different kind of proposal altogether.
"The first kind of deal that we have to be worried about… they may pitch an agreement that is based more on transposing the current reality onto paper… these kinds of agreements are more like understandings," Taleblu said.
"You take the present reality, and you transpose that onto paper, and then you make the U.S. pay for something it already achieved."
Taleblu outlined what he sees as Tehran’s strategic objectives. "The Iranians want three things, essentially. The first is they want to deter and prevent a strike."
"The second is that they are actually using negotiations… to take the wind out of the wings of Iranian dissidents. And then the third is… they actually do want some kind of foreign financial stabilization and sanctions relief."
"What the Iranians want is to play for time… an agreement like this doesn’t really require the Iranians to offer anything."
At the same time, Taleblu said the administration’s intentions remain deliberately opaque. "It’s hard to read the tea leaves of the administration here. Obviously, they don’t want a nuclear Iran, but also obviously they don’t want a long war in the Middle East."
"The military architecture they’re moving into the region is signaling that they’re prepared to engage in one anyway. The question that the administration has not resolved politically… is: What is the political end state of the strikes? That’s the cultivation of ambiguity that the president excels at."
Jacob Olidort, Chief Research Officer and Director of American Security at the America First Policy Institute, told Fox News Digital, "The President has been clear that he wants to give diplomacy a chance. However, if, in his estimation, diplomatic efforts prove unsuccessful, he will almost certainly turn to military options. What is rightfully unpredictable is the specific objective and scope of military action the President may take."
"Specifically, will military action serve as a new layer of diplomatic pressure towards creating a new opportunity to make Iran agree to our demands — military force as coercive diplomacy — or simply achieve the intended objectives that diplomacy could not? Regardless, the President has a record of taking bold action to protect the American people from Iran’s threats."
Public sentiment inside Iran remains deeply divided, Iranian sources told Fox News Digital. Many view a foreign military invasion as unacceptable, while anger over the killing of young protesters continues to fuel domestic tensions and uncertainty.
With a 10 to 15-day window ticking, Trump’s deadline may function less as a calendar marker and more as leverage.
JOHN YOO: Supreme Court tariff ruling should end complaints that justices favor Trump
The Supreme Court just struck down President Donald Trump’s worldwide tariffs. Contrary to immediate takes on the opinion, Learning Resources v. Trump does not mark a permanent reduction in presidential power. If he chooses, Trump could restore many of his tariffs over the next year under different laws. But Learning Resources should put to bed the left’s attacks on the court and the Constitution, while also highlighting the need for cooperation between the president and Congress in managing foreign affairs.
Writing for a 6-3 majority, Chief Justice John Roberts reaffirmed two basic constitutional principles. First, he wrote that the Constitution vests the power to impose tariffs and taxes in Congress alone. Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution states that "Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposes and Excises," and "To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations." Second, Congress can delegate that power to the president. Congress has enacted a series of trade laws that have. There was no real disagreement among any of the justices on these two fundamental points.
Where the justices divided is whether Congress had given the president the power to impose the unique, worldwide, immediate tariffs that he imposed last year. On Liberation Day, April 2025, Trump invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 (IEEPA) to set targeted tariffs not only on Canada, Mexico and China, but also a universal tariff of at least 10% on all imports. Roberts, joined by a rare coalition of three conservative justices (himself, Justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett) and three liberal justices (Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson), held that IEEPA did not grant the executive the power to impose tariffs.
The majority unduly narrowed the reach of IEEPA. IEEPA grants the power to the president, in the event of an "unusual and extraordinary threat" to American national security, foreign policy or the economy from abroad, to investigate, block, "regulate, direct and compel, nullify, void, prevent or prohibit" economic transactions with another country.
US TARIFF REVENUE UP 300% UNDER TRUMP AS SUPREME COURT BATTLE LOOMS
Trump declared that the large trade deficit created a national emergency; the court did not touch this aspect of the president’s tariff orders. Instead, the court held that because Congress did not include the specific word "tariff" in IEEPA’s list of powers, it had not granted this power to the executive.
"The President asserts the extraordinary power to unilaterally impose tariffs of unlimited amount, duration, and scope. In light of the breadth, history, and constitutional context of that asserted authority, he must identify clear congressional authorization to exercise it," Roberts writes. "IEEPA’s grant of authority to ‘regulate … importation’ falls short. IEEPA contains no reference to tariffs or duties."
This reading pays no attention to the way that the United States has used IEEPA and its predecessor statute, the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917. The government, and the lower courts, have long understood the power to "regulate" trade to include the power to impose a complete embargo on hostile nations, such as Cuba, Iran and North Korea.
SUPREME COURT KEEPS NATION WAITING ON TRUMP TARIFF DECISION, RELEASES 3 LOWER-PROFILE OPINIONS
IEEPA’s reference to the powers to "regulate" and "prevent" "importation" of foreign goods is quite sufficient to justify the president in imposing tariffs. Indeed, if sufficiently high, tariffs are simply a tool to "prevent or prohibit" such "importation."
Nevertheless, Learning Resources will not prevent Trump from succeeding in the end. The decision only says that the administration cannot impose tariffs under the IEEPA statute. But Congress has enacted several trade laws that clearly grant the president the power to impose tariffs.
Going by the nicknames of Section 232, Section 301, and Super 301, among others, these laws allow the executive to impose reciprocal tariffs in response to high tariffs on American goods, to sanction unfair trade practice by other countries, or to address a surge of imports in a specific product. And trade law still allows tariffs on specific countries that pose a national security threat to the United States. The Supreme Court did not touch those powers, and, as Trump made clear in his press conference, he intends to re-enact as many of his tariffs as possible under these other laws.
BESSENT WARNS OF 'GIGANTIC LOSS' IF SUPREME COURT STRIPS TRUMP'S EMERGENCY TARIFF POWERS
Beyond the technical reading of trade statutes, and its impact on Trump’s economic policies, Learning Resources bears deeper lessons on our constitutional order.
First, the decision belies the attacks from the left that the Supreme Court – particularly its conservative majority – simply rubber stamps the Trump administration’s policies. Here, two of Trump’s appointments to the Supreme Court, Gorsuch and Barrett, joined Chief Justice Roberts, himself appointed by President George W. Bush, in striking down the Trump tariffs.
They were joined by the three justices appointed during the Obama and Biden administrations. These justices did not decide the case because they agree or disagree with tariffs or like or dislike Trump. They simply voted because of the way that they read the IEEPA statute’s lack of the word "tariff."
CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION
Second, Learning Resources denies the left’s cries of wolf that the United States is falling under an authoritarian regime. Learning Resources demonstrates, again, that the separation of powers continues to work.
Congress alone has the power to impose tariffs and taxes as part of its overall power of the purse. It can delegate that power to the president; and it has. But when existing statutes are silent, Congress retains the constitutional power to set tariff rates. Trump did not claim a right to impose tariffs unilaterally under his executive power; he continuously argued that Congress simply had given him that power in IEEPA. Even if he reimposes tariffs, he will have to use other trade laws enacted by Congress. Using delegated powers according to the terms set out by Congress does not amount to authoritarianism.
Lastly, Learning Resources points the way for future cooperation between the president and Congress. The dissenters –Thomas, Alito and Kavanaugh – argued that the court should have read IEEPA broadly in order to allow the president to conduct foreign policy and protect the national security. While the president bears the constitutional responsibility to address foreign threats and advance the nation’s interests abroad, the Constitution vests in Congress the means of international economics.
In order to achieve the nation’s interests in restoring dominance in the Western Hemisphere or fending over the rising threat of China, the president and Congress will have to cooperate to ensure that economic policy plays a harmonious role in a full-spectrum American approach to the world.
Fox News Poll: Trump’s tariffs faced broad disapproval even before Supreme Court ruling
Even before the Supreme Court handed a blow to President Donald Trump's sweeping trade policy, Americans were already voicing strong disapproval in national polling of his handling of tariffs.
A Fox News survey conducted between Jan. 23 and 26 found 63% of registered voters disapprove of Trump’s handling of tariffs, while 37% approve, a 26-point deficit that ranks trade among his weakest-performing issues.
The results highlight resistance to the administration’s aggressive trade strategy. The White House has promoted tariffs as both an economic lever and a source of federal revenue, but the poll suggests that argument is not resonating with many voters.
SUPREME COURT DEALS BLOW TO TRUMP’S TRADE AGENDA IN LANDMARK TARIFF CASE
TRUMP'S TARIFF REVENUES HIT RECORD HIGHS AS SUPREME COURT DEALS MAJOR BLOW
This administration has repeatedly argued that tariff revenue can fund domestic priorities like lowering the nation's $38 trillion debt and potentially delivering a $2,000 dividend check to Americans.
And collections have surged.
Since Trump’s return to office, tariff revenue has climbed more than 300%. In January alone, duties totaled $30.4 billion, up 275% from a year earlier. So far this fiscal year, revenue has reached $132.6 billion.
Yet despite the windfall, public opinion has not followed the same trajectory.
Disapproval extends beyond trade. The poll found 59% disapprove of Trump’s handling of the economy and 65% disapprove of his handling of inflation, economic anxieties that may be shaping views of tariff policy.
Taken together, the numbers indicate that even before recent legal developments, the president’s trade agenda was facing significant public headwinds, raising questions about its political durability as cost-of-living concerns persist.
Major fast-food chains roll out limited-time fish sandwiches for Lent: See the list
Lent typically means giving up meat on Fridays — but not necessarily sacrificing fast food.
Observant Catholics who avoid meat on Fridays usually have two choices in the fast-food drive-thru: grilled cheese or fish sandwiches.
Fish sandwiches have become a Lenten staple, and fast-food chains are leaning in with limited-time offerings this season.
YOUR FRIDAY FISH FRY JUST GOT MORE EXPENSIVE AS LENT BEGINS AMID SEAFOOD SPIKES
It's not just Filet-O-Fish sandwiches from McDonald's.
Below are some popular fast-food joints offering limited-time fish sandwiches.
Wendy's brought back its fan-favorite fish sandwich for Catholics this Lent.
"This limited-time fish sandwich has earned a strong, dedicated fan base over the years, and we're here to give the people what they want," the chain said in a Feb. 17 statement.
BUFFETS MAKE OLD-SCHOOL COMEBACK AS AMERICANS HUNT FOR DINING VALUE: 'FINANCIAL GENIUS'
"The wild-caught Alaskan pollock fillet's buttery flakiness is complimented by savory notes of garlic and onion, inspiring our fans' love of the fish sandwich's texture, flavor and crispiness."
Wendy's said the sandwich pairs best with its Hot & Crispy fries, Cheese Fries or the Chive Baked Potato.
The sandwich will be available until Easter, which falls on April 5.
The Bojangler Fish Sandwich is back on menus.
Bojangles said in a Feb. 19 statement that the release comes "just in time for the Lenten season."
LEFTOVER HACKS EXPLODE ON SOCIAL MEDIA AS AMERICANS FIGHT HIGH PRICES WITH SCRAP FOOD FEASTS
"The original Bojangler features a crispy, panko-breaded Alaskan pollock filet seasoned with Bo's famous seasoning, topped with a slice of American cheese and served on a toasted bun with Duke's tartar sauce," the chain said in a statement.
"Guests can also make it a Bojangler Deluxe, adding shredded lettuce, sliced tomato and pickles for an upgraded take on the classic sandwich that brings extra crunch and freshness to every bite."
Though not quite a fish sandwich, Del Taco is offering its Jumbo Shrimp Tacos and Burrito this Lenten season.
"For a limited time, guests can grab two tacos for $6, packed with crispy Jumbo Shrimp, house-made pico de gallo, crunchy cabbage and Del Taco's signature secret sauce, all wrapped in a warm flour tortilla and each served with a fresh-cut lime wedge," the chain said in a Feb. 3 statement.
TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ
Del Taco is also selling a Beer Battered Fish Taco, which the chain says is made with "wild-caught Alaska pollock and finished with fresh toppings and a lime wedge."
"Fish lovers can get three tacos for $7 any time, so seafood celebrations aren't just for Fridays," the statement added.
Dairy Queen's Wild Alaska Fish Sandwich is "fried to golden perfection," according to its website.
The Alaskan pollock just hit national menus in time for Lent.
"This flaky, mild fish is expertly paired with crisp lettuce and creamy, tangy tartar sauce, all nestled in a warm, toasted bun," the chain says.
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR LIFESTYLE NEWSLETTER
"It's like a little taste of the coast, no matter where you are — comforting, satisfying and oh-so-delicious."
Dairy Queen warned, however, that the offering "won't stick around forever."
The Whatacatch Sandwich features a "wild-caught Alaskan pollock fillet, coated in seasoned panko breadcrumbs and fried to perfection," according to Whataburger's website.
"It's topped with fresh lettuce, two slices of juicy tomato and tangy tartar sauce, all tucked into a soft bun," the chain said.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE LIFESTYLE STORIES
"Want to take it up a notch? Add melted American cheese or a side of Creamy Pepper Sauce for a little extra kick."
The Whatacatch Sandwich meal deal — with medium fries and a drink — is available for $9.49, according to Whataburger.
For a limited time, Arby's is offering an indulgent fish sandwich with King's Hawaiian bread.
Arby's website describes the King's Hawaiian Fish Deluxe Sandwich as a "crispy fish fillet with cheddar cheese, shredded lettuce, tomato and tartar sauce on a toasted King's Hawaiian roll."
"Limited time offer at participating locations while supplies last," the chain notes.
If you'd prefer something more basic, Arby's is also offering its Crispy Fish Sandwich for a limited time.
The Crispy Fish Sandwich features "a crispy fish fillet with shredded lettuce and tartar sauce on a toasted sesame bun," per the chain.
Anna Murdoch-Mann, author and philanthropist, dead at 81
Anna Murdoch-Mann, 81, passed away Tuesday, Feb. 17 — surrounded by family — at her home in Palm Beach, Florida.
Many worlds loved Anna. Devoted mother, handsome lady, sharp wit, love of writing and lifetime commitment to helping children in need.
Born Anna Torv in Glasgow, Scotland, in 1944, her family emigrated to Australia when she was 9. Following her parents’ divorce, she herself raised her young siblings, then became a reporter at the Sydney Daily Mirror and later the Sydney Daily Telegraph.
During her 31-year marriage to Rupert Murdoch, she was his active partner in building this civilization’s great global business News Corp.
ADAM SANDLER LEADS TRIBUTES TO ROBERT DUVALL, CALLS HIM 'ONE OF THE GREATEST ACTORS WE EVER HAD'
Anna Murdoch-Mann, 81, passed away Tuesday, Feb. 17 — surrounded by family — at her home in Florida.
Following their divorce, Anna was a glamorous, gorgeous figure in Palm Beach and South Hampton. Then long-married to Bill Mann, who later passed away, she is survived by her husband Ashton dePeyster, her three children, 10 grandchildren and one great-grandchild.
The author of three novels: "In Her Own Image" (1985), "Family Business" (1988), and "Coming to Terms" (1992), much of her time was devoted to philanthropy and children’s causes.
MACAULAY CULKIN MOURNS 'HOME ALONE' MOM CATHERINE O'HARA WITH HEARTFELT MESSAGE
Resident of LA in the 1990s, she worked for Children’s Institute, which services over 5,000 abused children yearly. Her annual fund-raiser brought in millions.
She was chair of the LA Children’s Hospital board of regents. Active in Haiti, she served as chair of Hospital Albert Schweitzer for children in Deschapelles, Haiti.
Anna stepped down when she was diagnosed with cancer.
VALENTINO GARAVANI, LEGENDARY ITALIAN FASHION DESIGNER, DEAD AT 93
In 1998, Anna was made a Dame of the Order of St. Gregory the Great by Pope John Paul II.
Not only talented, she was also witty. Many Thanksgivings ago she told me, "Our turkey was imported."
She was — and still is — cherished by our Cardinal Timothy Dolan. He remembers teasing her about getting too thin. He told Anna she needs to eat more. Answered Anna: "You do the eating — I’ll do the talking."
He also recalls her love of gardening. She told His Eminence when he was still Archbishop of New York: "I love receiving flowers. I can then replant them in my garden in the Hamptons."
Many people loved Anna Murdoch.
Trump gives grudging praise to liberal trio who helped sink his tariffs
President Donald Trump grudgingly praised the trio of liberal justices on the U.S. Supreme Court who helped block his use of an emergency law to impose sweeping tariffs on trading partners, pointing to their "loyalty" to Democrats.
"The Democrats on the court are thrilled, but they will automatically vote no," Trump said Friday during a press conference. "They're an automatic no. Just like in Congress, they're an automatic no. They're against anything that makes America strong, healthy and great again. They also are frankly a disgrace to our nation. Those justices, they're an automatic no. No matter how good a case you have. It's a no."
"You can't knock their loyalty. It's one thing you can do with some of our people," he said.
DEMOCRATS CHEER SUPREME COURT MOVE BLOCKING TRUMP TARIFFS — DESPITE PAST SUPPORT FOR TRADE DUTIES
The Court’s three liberal justices are Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson.
Trump held a press conference at the White House Friday, just hours after the Supreme Court ruled that Trump exceeded his authority by imposing sweeping tariffs using emergency powers. The decision was a 6-3 ruling, with conservative Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissenting.
Trump praised the three conservatives who dissented.
"I'd like to thank and congratulate Justices Thomas, Alito and Kavanaugh for their strength and wisdom and love of our country, which is right now very proud of those justices," he said. "When you read the dissenting opinions, there's no way that anyone can argue against them."
Kavanaugh authored the main dissent, which argued that presidents have "commonly" imposed tariffs to regulate imports. He also warned there would be "serious practical consequences" over the high court's decision in terms of refunding the imposed tariffs.
"The United States may be required to refund billions of dollars to importers who paid the IEEPA tariffs, even though some importers may have already passed on costs to consumers or others," Kavanaugh wrote. "As was acknowledged at oral argument, the refund process is likely to be a ‘mess.’"
‘TARIFFS SUCK’: SOME REPUBLICANS PRIVATELY CELEBRATE AS SUPREME COURT BLOCKS TRUMP POLICY
Trump had promoted tariffs under emergency orders as a key piece of his policy related to the economy, arguing tariffs would usher in a flood of revenue from foreign nations that had been "ripping off" the U.S. for decades.
Tariffs also were leveraged to attract foreign businesses, as well as U.S. companies, to open up shop on U.S. soil to avoid the taxes, while simultaneously bolstering U.S. jobs and manufacturing.
AS TRUMP TOUTS TARIFF WINDFALL, BATTLEGROUND STATES SHOULDER BILLIONS IN COSTS
Trump continued that the ruling "did not overrule tariffs, but "merely overruled a particular use of IEEPA tariffs."
The International Emergency Economic Powers Act is a 1977 emergency powers law that lets a president, after declaring a national emergency tied to a foreign threat, restrict or regulate certain international economic transactions — most commonly to impose sanctions.
Trump relied on IEEPA as the legal basis for the tariffs the Court struck down, ruling that the statute does not authorize tariffs.
As a first step following the decision, Trump announced a 10% global tariff while touting "other alternatives" separated from IEEPA will be used to impose tariffs on foreign nations.
"Other alternatives will now be used to replace the ones that the court incorrectly rejected," Trump said. "We have alternatives. Great alternatives. Could be more money. We'll take in more money, and we'll be a lot stronger for it. We're taking in hundreds of billions of dollars. We'll continue to do so."
"Today I will sign an order to impose a 10% global tariff under section 122 over and above our normal tariffs already being charged," Trump said. "And we're also initiating several section 301 and other investigations to protect our country from unfair trading practices of other countries and companies."